Dynamic stability analysis of tailings dams

From QueensMineDesignWiki
Revision as of 14:21, 26 February 2017 by TPackulak (talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search


The regulation of dams and dam safety falls under the responsibility of the provincial/territorial government. Canada is unique from other countries in the fact that no federal agency or over-arching program which guides the development of requirements for the safe management of dams. In the 1980’s the Canadian Dam Association was formed to provide dam owners, operators, consultants, suppliers and government agency with a national forum to discuss issues of dam safety[1]. It is evident that in high or moderate seismicity areas the design of tailings dams must take potential seismic activity into consideration. Many failures have occurred due to a lack of concern with respect to seismic hazard. Most failures are strongly related to inertial and/or weakening instabilities of the dam slopes[2]

Classification of Dams

Due to the size of these structures and the impacts that a failure a dam can have, dam safety regulations and recognized practices are in place for the design, construction, operation, and maintenance. As some structures carry more risk than others, the required standard of care can vary based on dam classification. Dams are classified based upon estimates of potential consequences association with dam failure. This classification provides guidance on the standard of care expected of dam owners and designers as well as distinguish lower risk dams from higher risk dams (Table 1). [3] [4]

Standard practice for safety evaluations of dams in industry today consist of a standards-based approach. This is a deterministic concept and because it is computationally straightforward, provides the reassurance of a well-known method that provides easy to understand measures (Safety Factors). The probability of a dam failure cannot be quantified using deterministic approaches as it does not consider the large amount of uncertainty regarding the load intensities and the ability of a dam to resist given loads. Risks associated with the dam are managed through the use of classification schemes that reflect the potential consequences. Table 2 outlines the frequency based target levels for earthquakes, for use in load resistance performance analysis. [3]

Assessing the Seismic Risk

Before designing a tailings dam, the required seismic design parameters (Earthquake Design Ground Motion {EDGM}) should be calculated though the completion of a seismic risk assessment. [3] Products from a seismic hazard analysis typically consist of a seismic source characterization, development of hazard curves, development of uniform hazard spectra, and development of acceleration time-histories.[5]

Seismic Source Characterization

Seismic source characterization involves the identification and documentation of relevant possible earthquake sources in a region. [5] Typically this is completed through literature reviews focusing on tectonics, seismology, and geology of the site area. The review may also include analyses of remote sensing imagery, geophysical data and site investigations to evaluate documented or suspected active structures. [6]

Study of the regional geology should encompass an approximate area with at minimum a 100 km radius around the site with consideration to extend the study in order to encompass any major fault or structure that could affect the ground motions at the site. Typical topics covered in a regional study include [6]:

  • Identification of seismotectonic provinces related to the project
  • Geologic history of the area
  • Description of the regional geologic formations, rock types, and soil deposits to evaluate seismic energy transmission, effects, and duration of ground motion
  • Location of major regional geological structural features, including folds and joint families
  • Interpretation of the regional tectonic mechanisms and associated types of faulting
  • Location and description of shear zones and faults
  • Estimation of the relative degrees of fault activity for each of the faults of concern to the study area

Once the regional study has been completed a local/site specific study can be conducted. This is necessary to determine the potential for surface rupture and to evaluate local site response effects on earthquake ground motions. The information for a site specific study can be collected through reviewing published geological reports, field observations, and detailed site specific investigations that may include geological mapping, trenching, shear wave velocity measurements, drilling, material sampling, and laboratory testing. The local study typically covers [6]:

  • Geotechnical character, depositional history, orientation, lateral extent, and thickness of soil units beneath the site and on adjacent slopes
  • The character, lateral extent and thickness of rock units
  • The structural geology of the site to include rock unit attitudes, faults, and joint systems, folding, and intrusive bodies
  • The age and activity level of faults in the dam and reservoir area
  • The geohydrology of the site area to include water table conditions, soil and rock transmissivity coefficients, and recharge areas
  • The existing and potential ground failure and subsidence, including rock and soil stability, dispersive soil conditions, and soil units exhibiting characteristics for potential liquefaction

The seismic hazard study can provide support to determine the ground motions at the project site and the attenuation of the area. Attenuation studies are difficult due to inhomogeneous ground conditions and therefore usually estimated by studying historical, empirical and/or theoretical data. Information that is required in attenuation studies are [6]:

  • Instances where ground motion data are available, to develop site-specific attenuation relationships or scattering functions
  • Isoseismal maps constructed from historical earthquake data provide an indirect measure of ground motion attenuation


  1. P. Campbell, P.Eng., MCIP, M. Dolbec, ing, M.B.A., G. Ford, G. I. Haack, P.Eng, N. Heisler, W. Jolley, R. Kamel, Ph.D., P.Eng., S. Kaczmarek, L. Marcoux, C. McLean, MASc, MBA, P.Eng., T. Moulding, M.Sc, M. Passey, A. Roy ing, M.Sc., X. Su, Ph.D., P.Eng, J. Theakston, P.Eng., and K. M. Wog, M.Eng., P.Eng., "Regulation of Dams and Tailings Dams in Canada," in CDA 2010 Annual Conference - Congres annuel 2010 de l'ACB, Niagara Falls, 2010.
  2. P. N. Psarropoulos and Y. Tsompanakis, "Stability of Tailings Dams Under Static and Seismic Loading," Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 663-675, 05 2008.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 Canadian Dam Association - Association Canadienne des Barrages, Dam Safety Guidelines 2007 (2013 Edition), Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Dam Association, 2013.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Government of British Columbia: Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, "Downstream Consequence of Failure Classification Interpretation Guideline for Dam Safety Officers," Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations, Victoria, 2016.
  5. 5.0 5.1 U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Best Practices in Dam and Levee Safety Risk Analysis, vol. 4, Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2015.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 Federal Emergency Management Agency, "Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety," Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, 2005.